🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a pending law that include lowering the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be decreased to 30% or 50% “according to global suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

The WHO in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least 50% of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for multiple violations “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and harvest that and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are perishing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator stated: “The company operates its operations according with applicable local laws. Further, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, noting that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.